It defies all common sense that women who exclaimed that Hillary was “The One,” would flock their undying support and love of candidate to another who is so opposite in every way. The next new “The One.”
Isn’t it odd , and coincidental, that so many women, at least if you are to believe all the polls, are flocking to The One without any vetting.. being that The One is a woman is all they need to know, and want. Sarah Palin is their new The One.
How blatantly stupid of them … all of them. Hillary’s flock. Other women. To blindly support anyone who represents the opposite of everything that they said they believed in; that they wanted … just because they are the same gender. No vetting necessary.
“She seems nice; she’s got kids; she’s worked her way up; she’s pretty; she’s funny; she’s a good speaker; she’s so friendly, she’s fun … she’d be fun at girls night out … she’s fill in the blank.
In her first interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson, it was clear that she didn’t know very much… so she winged it, whatever “it” was. Imagine, anyone with any intelligence accepting a “winger” as a VP or possible President.
This person who is clueless about foreign affairs, about anything/any way that Washington DC ticks, and is so willing to parrot anything that her handlers tell her and exclaim that she is qualified to be President is dangerous … and scary. I wonder what ole Charlie really thought about her, as she blinked, talked about blinking, feigned coyness and did a fairly good job of manipulating him?
Let’s go back to the female fickle factor. Women are more covert than men… not that men don’t do their share of covert activities. My research and books that include 9 national studies on women and their personal and workplace relationships support this.
Both Sarah Palin and John McCain are staboteurs and saboteurs. They are intentionally setting out to destroy Obama’s reputation, even his record. The real one. To mislead the American public about Obama. The outrageous ads referencing pushing sex education on little kids; statements that Obama has never worked with the opposite party (I wonder how Republican Dick Luger feels that he’s been cast as a Democrat after all these years as Indiana’s senior Senator; or lies about increasing taxes where it’s clear that anyone under $250,000 comes out ahead with Obama.
To the extent, that even the dirtiest of pols, Karl Rove, told the McCain camp that they needed to back off. The black pot calling the other black pot more than black!
Typically, women will give other women more slack, more space, and more leeway. A woman is less likely to confront another woman about toxic behaviors or her own inappropriate behavior–instead rationalizing whatever the behavior is, even tying it into some wrong doing that might have led up to it.
And they, when she finally, truly realizes she’s been had, she feels betrayed… when it’s she who really betrayed herself.
Sarah Palin is George W Bush, only more dangerous. The pit bull or pig with lipstick. She’s smarter, much smarter than he is. That’s why she is a Trojan Horse–looks good, enticing from the outside and lethal when opened.
And here we are –deja vu. George W Bush all over again. The female fickle factor.
Tags: ABC, blink, Bush, Charlie Gibson, lipstick, pitbull, Rove, sabotage, Sarah, sarah palin, stupid woman, trojan horse, vetting, women
September 18, 2008 at 1:18 am |
I just wanted to comment that I am a woman who was a supporter of Hillary and I’m also a supporter of Barack.
All the women I know who supported Hillary think that Sarah Palin is a joke. Therefor, I conclude that the polls are wrong, slanted and confused. I also see it as a media blitz to try and convince women to vote for Sarah Palin. We are too smart for that.
In addition, I don’t happen to know one woman… and I am very politically active, who was in the camp of not accepting Barack Obama as the Democratic candidate. I believe the media over exaggerated that “female response” to Hillary’s loss in the Primary.
I see a pattern here.